|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 6148|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its- A$ `0 B; A9 L architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider4 J$ _, W4 B/ h3 u1 z Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"# ?$ \% |" g9 ~& |9 w2 c city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. : v+ B8 r/ P8 E1 x! hAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,3 P6 U* {; W" b) }+ o' M 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of. n) g2 o m0 L7 a Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within $ w# s3 f! k. Uhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among' C0 J$ h, t) p. F8 F each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 0 f8 G8 }. B% Jand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is& U- ` k& \: | o harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 1 a& L, w% J' @4 {descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and+ ~2 O# I3 [, t9 K forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I * ?, U6 W: v3 ^) ~was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 7 t4 y/ m @0 d/ g1 x, H, O$ v2 E4 {impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ( p1 t0 _/ M. o6 B/ gand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong' x4 t+ F# V$ y. r# A has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ; G- R3 _' ^. \9 k1 f+ vof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that . X- b& \! |/ ]7 l, [9 A. fno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are * H( ^5 Y$ A% conly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a " k) B2 P0 M9 S- Dsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government + e) |( @, ^, i1 f8 J0 g* d1 K. zwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 2 Y2 B; \) H8 Z* c( W7 f" d0 c& F d! Mto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is7 A4 E/ m& p4 c6 Z4 V "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 1 Y j4 {% R, Z0 f% @- p \6 n Mthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are1 j" g) t5 i$ X+ q still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ' k- @7 h. J9 l c) @* r"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make5 s) @: u9 A! a! B6 r7 F money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was5 g) H2 I+ _) f% L$ W. W a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a * }0 u& g" n# }4 A% o) @parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across , L- d4 }' B% ?/ t4 wthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural9 [( s: Y( m2 S, T4 S" J importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 7 V: _$ W" M* \$ P9 B- [) qdevelopment.

Hutongs 8 A* l; f/ c, o* r, g" t, Sin the old days were residential area where people actually lived ! M$ q- h$ k4 x4 f% Qthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 2 w/ n+ u$ Q! h3 P4 K: x8 g" Vin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not/ U2 S, a( I5 R+ `$ e6 p have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you # w0 F) o; V* u% Iwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 9 v/ I& k6 {* p; N7 nFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date + r+ U% K1 Q% ?3 y( C' o( Y: jto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used0 Q/ K% \! @- k; c) @ to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses G M+ c+ {# K ?" R0 m support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically: f4 H. W* M9 P) q unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to) c% `" p* a! |: F. B. y( [ live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,! G4 b( u; F' o$ D3 }0 W hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the $ w1 m) ~- \8 d6 P H; pbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the' c* J6 |8 z% z+ r+ z" k( f project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 5 f6 _, |- F/ ~3 zrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong8 j# D! I( S, N Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how" R: q6 h* {1 A f9 N" p people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 6 F& V, j- u1 J+ d- Y, \$ N% ^# z2 ttorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished5 w2 v, p/ |; G: W( _0 l memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".; x' z, Q1 ]0 z! h* x( e7 M Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are) s0 n+ m/ z( j& ~. ` aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially ; K% s) X$ |. I( p: o/ Q7 Pnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image; a& [ V7 v% d- R. d of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ' u! l7 _! m, y( Q+ C4 _Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those z5 r/ f- `+ s- \ people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they4 y! ]$ G% n0 l may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 4 E8 ^! h. z/ H6 V2 t$ bof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before3 e- j% a: v2 C "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all / X& l8 j' P$ K- Y) E; r& D& [2 Hpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 9 |4 Q- |! H# s# x& d" p! a' {7 lapartments are the way to go? No.6 G( |+ D5 P/ f ( Z3 P/ b4 B5 F) K0 w ' Q7 @: V- h& {# s

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 3 v( {8 K( o3 k6 O3 qsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this) h. e/ O# ?. p* g: [( ]& V* {5 ~ 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 5 c6 }5 P* y4 p: V$ Z* O5 }0 K5 f5 {no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so & }* [6 e) P+ o2 J1 Pfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant / S3 P) ]( }- t9 Oresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless9 F4 j x' a( c- x' O& I: ^ Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is . u5 z8 X6 y' y1 ?' c2 V+ C `3 uunlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-10-6 01:49 , Processed in 1.138068 second(s), 6 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部