|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 6149|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its$ {% k! C D5 c2 n7 s( l1 O architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider; `) H: a' N6 L4 y' x- S& L' ? Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"6 P5 p6 g; ]1 t1 n) s0 q city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 9 \# o4 w) Z6 x" gAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, S3 [ @5 |! ~8 u n+ }3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of $ E3 [" ^' q& N, c( pManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within F; u, p2 t& ^& y hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among- L2 [( {0 T/ r5 _$ N each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera # \3 y) B- F! ?4 Q; iand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ) k; i. Q2 p7 o- e. I5 bharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are/ [; W1 s; z- R* B* u& E descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 0 s% ~: }/ \/ O0 r) q* T' N% Q" bforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 6 U0 m8 G7 O( M( I2 z# r* t. ewas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great " d7 H7 F+ d4 D& X4 C# @ Pimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ; {6 g, A' C& D+ Rand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong ; q7 {& |' ?. h- {has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment# R$ I/ N; m, s of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that1 y1 F$ o; Q- O7 o1 [ no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are % I( s9 n* Z- Bonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a, W7 q/ g3 U9 h/ N' u# j sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government - ?( e8 M6 K; u/ Mwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move+ S$ h" {. {- u, p0 Y; n3 z to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 8 q7 h# B4 X. u"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,# r$ T8 s5 n5 Q6 W( U! y+ O" R2 @+ R this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ?# p) Q c5 d! u: `6 [. qstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to- M- g) Z5 [3 Z8 A) Y% y! T "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make $ s9 H1 S- |& S! Nmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was `9 V5 w9 {3 h; Y3 r a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a; H0 i+ Z# ~2 v9 `: V parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across* T' x* P2 G& u. u a( C; L& s7 } the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural # {6 w# Y6 |1 l) Simportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for* g2 X% M1 \0 F+ B development.

Hutongs/ J1 [" B6 k# V: \/ S: A% Z: { in the old days were residential area where people actually lived. T$ j+ Y6 m8 ?9 ]: P( f1 k/ L there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions; A: c6 ]8 R8 r4 [, `7 H in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not+ ^# K) S: T+ m have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you l" e) K' P" R, s3 R: jwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.* P- I% }- K& M* t3 o Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 5 ~/ D0 F! _* `8 V) p2 q& Pto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used% Q a4 `6 j, _8 F to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ( F) m- j) x9 usupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically& R4 | j' n/ E0 b! f. j0 W unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to- i5 I7 r) t+ {0 t; J: w+ a live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,6 y. K, I5 s/ O! `5 `1 m+ D hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the+ ]* M1 w& ^. r* P a- D# l balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; k1 X9 T) V* ~' H7 @5 `( \9 U project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ; c/ X4 K! [, {" o p! `renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong ( N/ T b1 k" y! x1 J H, yMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 5 b4 [! Z' m! N% I; Y$ |people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ; Z4 b) g+ K9 n9 M) Z2 E# `torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished) J4 H9 X% d( Y9 X3 ]2 J9 w6 r* a) y memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".% k2 r. H( e: {' b$ n: \ Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are; p1 n$ \" J* Y5 l! w aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially1 X% k5 R- ?; t, g0 M non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image- u# A0 q1 ]' U' x. o5 _) b of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 1 p0 U0 M! Y, D. V* SHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those$ e" P( R2 s8 e. ~7 A. j; x; n people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 1 p5 X9 y, P3 ]may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some & P5 S9 H" E3 v! fof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before g4 W- L% N9 C8 Y"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all $ w0 j. m; K5 \$ s! Hpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise , H% P9 N+ a4 m1 ^apartments are the way to go? No. ) v& R7 e8 b. g; v e- }8 P * P4 _4 Q! J6 M1 s7 [ 0 {. ]# K. N* [( {+ d5 R+ F

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the- j3 J% }9 _9 ^! g- p b situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this2 O- X: f8 O5 X- O6 Q4 V 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make % Y$ v% S4 R* V* Ino money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so - [$ U5 M5 s( X4 g) v7 Dfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant * |4 P1 Y; z# h4 M+ j! p7 P- E3 b) z' qresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless, l9 I2 e/ i5 q0 z3 O; e Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 5 S$ ?. C6 n2 D. _" }% y$ t7 @unlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-10-6 04:30 , Processed in 1.136143 second(s), 6 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部