|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 6145|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its5 E6 Q+ y, p ^" v; ]" _0 D5 `2 [ architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider F r) e' `' b0 X! JBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"" M8 D Y# k% c+ b/ d0 h9 O. w city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. , F" e3 R+ b; q+ O9 \According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, j* R/ y7 _7 k3 g# [4 @& Z# ? 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ( _7 g9 Z7 t2 \. l1 E# K: rManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within/ U0 s* B* _# S" J4 B hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among " l4 m: H8 H$ C! ^6 leach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera1 P" h$ E- ~) j; Y8 W) l and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is4 ?3 b( V" e' v% i) V' q harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ! m5 {* K1 q1 u6 Sdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ! ~5 U- C, L. d6 q; ?+ _) N7 zforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 5 B L; |( A1 x0 x6 T4 q. ?was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great! f* P1 Z b+ q+ W& X: {& F- s) ^# { impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 1 E/ Y& r( o" K5 kand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong% @' ~+ V4 {/ d3 O has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment0 W+ I" A; X% A, k2 M5 o q7 ] of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that / d# H% g7 _5 f5 p; w$ ~! A1 jno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 5 s2 t9 C2 A# B1 R7 o: Q* Gonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a* M" p$ w# H @2 g+ c sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government - m, G# h7 n6 K/ s- W1 Xwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ( G1 C% z+ Q9 P- x2 a7 T3 j. Vto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is0 l% V8 X( U4 F0 B7 ~; q "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,+ p9 _9 g4 j' E/ b2 }5 m% A; L this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are/ P+ E+ P6 A7 ~! j/ f+ g" x still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 0 q* c5 V% z" C7 \. W0 ^"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make+ O& c3 g" Y. ~. p0 P money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was4 L6 s5 V1 q! W, q a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a , I3 q8 Z* B/ u' f9 Oparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across4 k- M* N6 F. w. ^* X the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 5 ?( d; b: j# S- d0 q+ {importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for, Y" A, {1 ^. P7 P5 d- a( D development.

Hutongs8 S' w0 ~5 O6 x- e in the old days were residential area where people actually lived ) y6 f! G2 T5 L( Zthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions # Y8 P& X/ V3 |5 Ein hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not5 O; q& h8 G8 o have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you # e* D/ w" n1 V- cwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 5 ?( q! T4 y- j" ~- d, x7 wFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date$ Q _. i! O1 \& \8 J, j( f! @ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 9 ~9 c& ]" N' n" r4 D- k4 k8 ato hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses8 W4 q" {- B) [) @, ~/ d, I. u: d2 G support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 2 k7 c( o8 u }' x; o. U. tunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to2 m1 H; t# L+ O+ y0 @ live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, ; Y* ?- g; |5 s$ r o5 ~/ Mhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the / K! N( j0 A. obalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the' l: {( S9 d! D# \$ F) m project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be + j3 {; y2 _" U1 e6 C. W( jrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 0 I9 ]! Z1 W% o* z( L( rMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how # @% X y0 w" l# I' h3 W7 {/ Mpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be8 {- b% _8 }, ?5 @) _: w torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished / ]! s6 ^1 H: ^) wmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".# h* ] Z: m6 ~" _; X9 V1 A5 E Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& l! M0 T% P' G4 c aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially `, G5 a1 t( A non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image & z7 `( p8 }$ `* J% vof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these% Q! n- t4 q: m) M2 [ C s& B8 ] Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 8 D( k+ A3 ^" T& G1 R0 xpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 0 E; N! D; o9 S9 ^5 @# ~3 H9 emay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some/ |* G F# U% e' I of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before$ g; k& J: z: x7 p& o' r+ } "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all+ S) l( J8 F3 v( Q& O8 y, j% N% t5 H o- T people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 9 |- v& L Y- o- r* ^" Y9 Wapartments are the way to go? No." ^3 N- y* Z+ U% X/ {1 U i , k0 C. w1 C$ s) `# o5 b& T " x* K5 L7 m2 x ?: u

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the $ E1 e& `$ l: w5 f. i# h( A Lsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this # d+ p3 i' [# y1 t, ]5 {! U'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 2 R5 s( K- _8 s) h9 ]: R$ v7 ` t/ Zno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 8 [1 e. X' C2 A o/ f9 Ofast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 5 y: X7 _/ J) |# X# `/ b5 |3 Yresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ) a7 p6 H! J3 F2 \) L9 A; YBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is/ R% g* H0 `' ~' Z8 p! n unlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-10-5 14:30 , Processed in 1.125404 second(s), 7 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部